Materials and Methods: The primary aim of this randomized phase 3 trial was to test whether prophylactic placement of a parastomal mesh at ileal conduit formation reduced radiographic PH (rPH) rate compared with standard techniques without mesh; final rPH assessment was at 24 months. Ultrapro semiabsorbable mesh was placed in a sublay position dorsal to rectus muscle and anterior to posterior rectus sheath.
Results: Of 178 patients randomized, 137 were eligible for analysis. Thirty-two of the 68 (47%) evaluable patients in the mesh arm had rPH vs 23/69 (33%) patients in the nonmesh arm (risk difference 14%; 95% CI: -4.0%, 31%; P = .14). The overall odds ratio (OR) comparing those randomized to mesh vs no mesh was 1.78 (95% CI: 0.89, 3.55). The results were not meaningfully affected when stratified by BMI or surgeon, separately (by BMI: OR 1.74; 95% CI: 0.86, 3.51; P = .2; by surgeon: OR 1.69; 95% CI: 0.83, 3.41; P = .2).
Conclusions: We were unable to identify a clinical benefit to prophylactic parastomal mesh placement. Based on these findings, mesh at the time of conduit creation should not be used to avoid PH formation.
Timothy F Donahue,1 Melissa Assel,2 Eugene K Cha,1 Alvin Goh,1 Eugene Pietzak,1 Guido Dalbagni,1 Andrew Vickers,2 Hebert Alberto Vargas,3,4 Stephen Fleming,3 Bernard H Bochner1
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
- Now with NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.