State of Knowledge on the Specialized Management of Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Among General Practitioners in Western France in the Current Mesh Controversy Era - Beyond the Abstract
This study is based on a collaboration between general medicine and urogynecology, combining a primary care perspective with specialized clinical expertise. Despite the modest response rate of 4.1%, the results reveal clear trends and practical solutions.
This study reveals the underutilization of clinical screening tools and a lack of awareness of nonsurgical and non-mesh surgical therapies. Conversely, general practitioners seem to have a better grasp of older drug therapies and tape-mediated surgical techniques, suggesting a potential lack of up-to-date training in primary care. The results also suggest that the Implants Files have a limited impact on real-life practices.
This study emphasizes the necessity of developing continuing education programs for general practitioners in France regarding PFD management. The study could serve as a foundation for guiding future health policies and training initiatives for GPs in France.
Written by: Antoine Cassé, Department of Family Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
Read the Abstract