AUA 2026: Safety of Rucaparib versus Docetaxel or Second-generation Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and a BRCA mutation in TRITON3

(UroToday.com) The 2026 American Urologic Association Annual Meeting featured a presentation by Dr. Alan H. Bryce evaluating the safety and tolerability of rucaparib compared with physician’s choice of docetaxel or a second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) in patients with BRCA-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) enrolled in the phase III TRITON3 trial.

TRITON3 previously demonstrated that rucaparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) compared with physician’s choice therapy in chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC harboring BRCA alterations, reducing the risk of progression or death by 50%.1 In this presentation, Dr. Bryce focused on the detailed safety profile of rucaparib, including the incidence, timing, and management of the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), as well as adverse events of special interest such as anemia, thromboembolic events, and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML).

TRITON3 was a global, randomized, open-label phase III trial that enrolled patients with:

  • Chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC
  • A deleterious BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alteration identified by tissue or plasma testing
  • Prior treatment with one second-generation ARPI in any disease setting
  • ECOG performance status 0–1

Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to:

  • Rucaparib 600 mg twice daily (n = 270)
  • Physician’s choice (n = 135), consisting of:
    • Docetaxel (n = 75), or
    • Abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide (n = 60)

TRITON3 was a global, randomized, open-label phase III trial that enrolled patients with:
Randomization was stratified by ECOG performance status, presence of hepatic metastases, and genomic alteration subtype (BRCA1 vs BRCA2 vs ATM). The primary endpoint was independent radiology review (IRR)-assessed rPFS, with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) as key secondary endpoints.

The current safety analysis focused specifically on the BRCA-mutated population, which included:

  • Rucaparib: 201 patients
  • Physician’s choice: 97 patients
    • Docetaxel: 57 patients
    • Second-generation ARPI: 40 patients

At the August 25, 2022, data cutoff, all patients experienced at least one TEAE.

At the August 25, 2022, data cutoff, all patients experienced at least one TEAE.
Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in:

  • 59% of rucaparib-treated patients
  • 50% of patients receiving the physician’s choice
    • 54% with docetaxel
    • 43% with ARPI therapy

Dose modifications were common with rucaparib but rarely led to permanent discontinuation:

  • Dose reductions due to TEAEs: 36% with rucaparib vs 21% with physician’s choice
  • Dose interruptions: 53% vs 22%
  • Treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs: 14% vs 22%

Deaths attributed to TEAEs occurred in 3 rucaparib-treated patients (2%) and 2 patients receiving physician’s choice (2%). All were considered unrelated to the study treatment by the investigators.

The most common any-grade TEAEs with rucaparib included:

  • Fatigue/asthenia: 60.7% (Grade ≥3: 7.0%)
  • Musculoskeletal pain: 53.2% (Grade ≥3: 7.0%)
  • Nausea: 50.7% (Grade ≥3: 2.0%)
  • Anemia/hemoglobin decreased: 45.8% (Grade ≥3: 23.9%)

Compared with the physician’s choice, rucaparib was associated with lower rates of several toxicities commonly observed with chemotherapy:

  • Peripheral neuropathy: 12.4% vs 25.8%
  • Arthralgia: 16.4% vs 24.7%
  • Edema: 18.4% vs 19.6%

Compared with the physician’s choice, rucaparib was associated with lower rates of several toxicities commonly observed with chemotherapy:
The temporal profile of adverse events demonstrated that many nonhematologic toxicities developed early and were manageable with supportive care and dose adjustments.

Median time to first onset with rucaparib included:

  • Fatigue/asthenia: ~57 days
  • Nausea: ~27 days
  • ALT/AST elevation: ~21 days
  • Anemia/hemoglobin decreased: ~67 days
  • Thrombocytopenia: ~112 days

Median duration of select events included:

  • Anemia: 364 days
  • Thrombocytopenia: 41 days
  • Nausea: 46 days
  • Fatigue/asthenia: not reached

The temporal profile of adverse events demonstrated that many nonhematologic toxicities developed early and were manageable with supportive care and dose adjustments.
The recommended rucaparib dose modifications for TEAEs were:

  • Starting dose: 600 mg twice daily
  • First reduction: 500 mg twice daily
  • Second reduction: 400 mg twice daily
  • Third reduction: 300 mg twice daily

Despite dose modifications, treatment intensity remained high. The median dose intensity was 98% (range: 36–100%), and among patients who remained on treatment, more than 75% continued receiving 500 mg or 600 mg twice daily for over one year.

Adverse events of special interest with rucaparib included:

  • Anemia requiring transfusion: 28%
  • Pulmonary embolism: 4.5% any grade; 3.0% Grade ≥3
  • Deep vein thrombosis: 1.5% any grade; 0.5% Grade ≥3
  • MDS/AML: 2 patients (1%)
  • Pneumonitis: 1 patient (0.5%)

Despite dose modifications, treatment intensity remained high. The median dose intensity was 98% (range: 36–100%), and among patients who remained on treatment, more than 75% continued receiving 500 mg or 600 mg twice daily for over one year.
Transient elevations in ALT and AST occurred early after treatment initiation, normalized with continued therapy, and were not associated with other signs of drug-induced liver injury.

Dr. Bryce concluded his presentation of the TRITON3 safety analysis in BRCA patients as follows:

  • Rucaparib has a well-defined and manageable safety profile in patients with BRCA-mutated prostate cancer in TRITON3.
  • There was a low rate of discontinuation due to TEAEs, suggesting that supportive care and dose adjustments are effective strategies for mitigating TEAEs.

Presented by: Alan Bryce, MD, Professor of Molecular Medicine at Translational Genomics Research Institute, Chief Clinical Officer, City of Hope, Phoenix, AZ

Written by: Rashid K. Sayyid, MD, MSc, Assistant Professor, Urologic Oncologist, Department of Urology at The University of Arizona and Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ – @rksayyid on X during the American Urological Association (AUA) 2026 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, Fri, May 15 – Mon, May 18, 2026.

Reference:
  1. Fizazi K, Piulats JM, Reaume MN, et al. Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(8):719-732.