ASCO GU 2025: KEYMAKER-U03 Substudy 03B: Pembrolizumab and Targeted Therapy Combinations for Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC)

(UroToday.com) The 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary (GU) Annual Symposium held in San Francisco, CA was host to a renal cell cancer oral abstract session. Dr. Kathryn E. Beckermann presented KEYMAKER-U03 Substudy 03B of pembrolizumab plus targeted therapy combination for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).


Despite high response rates, approximately 70% of all patients with ccRCC will progress within 4 years of treatment with first-line PD-1 inhibitor-based combination regimens. Second- and later-line therapy for ccRCC generally consists of single-agent treatments, but combination therapies may offer benefits for these patients.

KEYMAKER-U03 is a phase 1/2 open-label, rolling arm, umbrella platform designed to evaluate combination treatments for previously treated, ccRCC that progressed on or after treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitor and VEGF-TKI therapy. Herein, Dr. Beckermann presented results from participants treated with targeted therapy-containing regimens:

  • Pembrolizumab + belzutifan (Arm B4)
  • Lenvatinib + belzutifan (Arm B5)
  • Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib

The study design of KEYMAKER-U03 Substudy 03B is illustrated below. This trial included patients with locally advanced/metastatic ccRCC with disease progression on or after PD-(L)-1 inhibitor + VEGF-TKI (either in combination or sequentially). There was an initial safety lead-in cohort, followed by an expansion cohort built into this trial. The primary endpoints were ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety, with secondary endpoints of:

  • Duration of response (DoR)
  • Clinical benefit response (CBR): CR + PR + SD
  • Progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR
  • Overall survival (OS)

image-0.jpg

From a statistical standpoint, endpoints were evaluated in each arm separately; no formal comparisons were made across arms. Efficacy was analyzed in all randomly allocated participants Safety was analyzed in all randomly allocated participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. ORR and CBR 95% CIs were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. DoR, PFS, OS, and associated 95% Cls were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. AEs were graded by severity, per the NCI CTCAE v5.0

The treatment disposition is summarized below. Of the 263 patients, 199 were allocated to Arm B4 (n=62), Arm B5 (n=64), and the pembrolizumab + lenvatinib arm (n=73). The median study follow-up ranged between 16.6 and 19.4 months. 

image-1.jpg

The baseline characteristics by treatment arm are summarized below. The median patient age was 60–63 years. 76-80% of patients had IMDC intermediate or poor risk disease. This was a heavily pre-treated population with 42–57% of patients having received ≥3 prior lines of systemic therapy.

image-2.jpg

The ORRs were as follows:

  • Pembrolizumab + belzutifan (Arm B4): 19.4%
    • Median DoR: not reached
    • Reduction in target lesion size: 66%
  • Lenvatinib + belzutifan (Arm B5): 47%
    • Median DoR: 22.1 months
    • Reduction in target lesion size: 88%
  • Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib: 40%
    • Median DoR: 8.3 months
    • Reduction in target lesion size: 92%

image-3.jpg

image-4.jpg

The median PFS rates were highest with the combination of lenvatinib + belzutifan (12.5 months), followed by pembrolizumab + lenvatinib (9.4 months) and pembrolizumab + belzutifan (5.4 months).

image-5.jpg

The median OS by arm were as follows:

  • Pembrolizumab + belzutifan: 27.4 months
  • Lenvatinib + belzutifan: 32.3 months
  • Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib: Not reached

image-6.jpg

All patients had any grade adverse events. Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 42% of patients in the pembrolizumab + belzutifan arm, 60% of those in the lenvatinib + belzutifan arm, and 50% of patients in the pembrolizumab + lenvatinib arm. There were similar rates of treatment discontinuations due to drug-related adverse events (10-12%).

image-7.jpg

Treatment-related adverse events with incidences ≥20% are summarized below. Notably, anemia was a common adverse event in the two belzutifan arms (65-69%).

image-8.jpg

Dr. Beckermann concluded as follows:

  • In the KEYMAKER-U03 Substudy 03B trial, where the vast majority of participants received 2 or more prior lines of therapy, lenvatinib plus belzutifan showed a numerically high OR of 46.9% and median PFS of 12.5 months
  • Results from the pembrolizumab plus belzutifan arm were similar to those observed with belzutifan monotherapy in the phase 3 LITESPARK-005 study
  • Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib also showed antitumor activity in this patient population, with an ORR of 39.7% and median PFS of 9.4 months
  • Adverse events were generally manageable, and safety profiles were consistent with the individual profiles of each agent
  • Results from Substudy-03B showed promising clinical activity of lenvatinib plus belzutifan, and this combination is currently being compared with cabozantinib in the randomized, phase 3 LITESPARK-011 trial

Presented by: Dr. Kathryn E. Beckermann, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Written by: Rashid K. Sayyid, MD, MSc – Robotic Urologic Oncology Fellow at The University of Southern California, @rksayyid on Twitter during the 2025 Genitourinary (GU) American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Thurs, Feb 13 – Sat, Feb 15, 2025.