ASCO 2025: Ipilimumab/nivolumab Versus Standard of Care in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cancer: Results of the SUNNIFORECAST Trial and Potential Role of the CPS Score and Tumor Nephrectomy

(UroToday.com) The 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting held in Chicago, IL between May 30th and June 3rd, 2025, was host to a kidney and bladder cancers poster session. Dr. Marit Ahrens presented the results of the SUNNIFORECAST trial of ipilimumab + nivolumab versus standard of care in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) and the potential role of the CPS score and tumor nephrectomy.

Non-ccRCCs are a rare and heterogeneous group of >20 histologically and molecularly defined tumors. Due to the relative rarity of these tumors, compared to ccRCC, clinical trials of non-ccRCC are limited owing to difficulty with patient enrollment into clinical trials. As such, treatment options remain limited for these patients. To date, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) +/- immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard of care options for these patients. Herein, Dr. Ahrens presented the results of a prospective randomized European trial that compared ipilimumab + nivolumab (IPI+NIVO) versus standard of care in therapy-naïve, advanced non-ccRCC patients.

Eligible non-ccRCC patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either:

  • Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV combined with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by a flat dose of 240 mg IV every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks
  • Standard of care therapy, per the investigator’s choice
    • Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerance

Randomization was stratified by non-ccRCC subtype (papillary versus non-papillary) and by IMDC risk score. Central pathology was mandatory to confirm the correct diagnosis of the non-ccRCC subtype according to the 2022 WHO classification.

Randomization was stratified by non-ccRCC subtype (papillary versus non-papillary) and by IMDC risk score. Central pathology was mandatory to confirm the correct diagnosis of the non-ccRCC subtype according to the 2022 WHO classification.
The primary study endpoint was the 12-months overall survival (OS) rate. The secondary endpoints were:

  • OS at 6 and 18 months
  • OS
  • Progression-free survival (PFS)
  • Objective response rate (ORR)

This trial included 309 patients, of whom 71% were male. Overall, 173 patients (56%) had papillary RCC, and 143 (44%) had non-papillary subtypes:

  • Chromophobe: 59
  • Sarcomatoid/rhabdoid: 20
  • Collecting duct: 10
  • TFE3-rearranged or TFEB-altered RCC: 11
  • Other: 37 

This trial included 309 patients, of whom 71% were male. Overall, 173 patients (56%) had papillary RCC, and 143 (44%) had non-papillary subtypes:
IMDC scores were as follows:

  • Favorable: 24%
  • Intermediate: 52%
  • Poor: 24%

IMDC scores were as follows: 

Patients in the IPI+NIVO arm had superior 12 months OS rates (78.3% versus 68.3%, p=0.026). The median OS was 33.2 versus 25.2 months, respectively. There was no difference in median PFS (5.4 versus 5.7 months, respectively). The ORRs were 33% and 19%, respectively.

The median OS and response to the study treatments differed by the CPS score. Patients with a CPS≥1 had a 12-months OS rate of 79.3% with IPI+NIVO and 58.3% with standard of care therapy, with median OS of 38.6 and 18.8 months (p=0.007), respectively.

The median OS and response to the study treatments differed by the CPS score. Patients with a CPS≥1 had a 12-months OS rate of 79.3% with IPI+NIVO and 58.3% with standard of care therapy, with median OS of 38.6 and 18.8 months (p=0.007), respectively.
OS outcomes also varied by prior nephrectomy status:

  • Prior nephrectomy:
    • IPI+NIVO: 38.9 months
    • Standard of care: 34 months
  • No prior nephrectomy
    • IPI+NIVO: 26.3 months
    • Standard of care: 16.5 months

 

OS outcomes also varied by prior nephrectomy status:
Dr. Ahrens concluded as follows:

  • The 12-months OS rate was significantly superior for non-ccRCC patients treated with ipilimumab + nivolumab versus standard of care therapy
  • Patients with a CPS score ≥1 treated with ipilimumab + nivolumab had a longer median OS

Presented by: Marit Ahrens, MD, Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany

Written by: Rashid K. Sayyid, MD, MSc – Robotic Urologic Oncology Fellow at The University of Southern California, @rksayyid on Twitter during the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025 Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, Fri, May 30 – Tues, Jun 3, 2025.